DNS Benchmark
Find the resolver that fits your connection.
Compare validated DNS-over-HTTPS response times from your browser, with consistency and success rates beside every result.
Run the benchmark ↗YOUR NETWORK, EXPLAINED
Find a faster DNS resolver. Inspect a domain. Get to the bottom of an email issue. Six focused tools, one place to start.
PICK YOUR STARTING POINT
Find the resolver that fits your connection.
Compare validated DNS-over-HTTPS response times from your browser, with consistency and success rates beside every result.
Run the benchmark ↗See what your domain is saying.
Inspect DNS records, check DNSSEC, and look up reverse DNS.
Look up DNS ↗Know who’s behind a domain.
Find registration dates, registrar details, nameservers, and network ownership.
Check ownership ↗Did your DNS change arrive?
Compare answers across independent public resolvers to spot cache differences.
Check propagation ↗Check the records behind delivery.
Inspect email routing and authentication with plain-English findings.
Check email DNS ↗See your connection from outside.
Find your public IPv4 and IPv6 addresses, reverse DNS, and network owner.
Find my IP ↗Our benchmark ranks validated responses by median latency and shows the variation behind each result. It measures browser-to-DoH performance on your current network.See how the benchmark works ↗
Provider privacy policies are linked in the resolver comparison. Our own data flow is documented in the privacy policy.
A cached lookup is what you experience most of the time. An uncached lookup is an upper bound, not a typical result.
Resolvers are tested in interleaved, shuffled rounds so that no provider is measured only while conditions happen to be good.
Each dot in Every measurement is one validated response, on a scale shared by every row; the upright bar is the median. The scale is logarithmic, because the difference between 20 ms and 40 ms matters far more than the difference between 300 ms and 320 ms. Dots stacked together mean a resolver answered in much the same time each round. Dots spread across the track mean it did not — and that is usually more important than which median happens to be lowest.
| # | Resolver | Every measurement | Median | Spread | Verified | IPv4 addresses |
|---|
These resolvers did not return a response this browser could read and verify, so they carry no latency figure. In most cases this is a browser limitation, not a fault in the resolver: a DNS-over-HTTPS endpoint that does not send cross-origin headers simply cannot be measured from a web page. Their configuration addresses are still listed in the resolver comparison.
| Resolver | Outcomes | Detail |
|---|
A low figure in the table above is a reason to try a resolver, not proof it will be faster for your whole system. What you measured here is an HTTPS request from this browser to a provider’s DNS-over-HTTPS endpoint. What you would configure in Windows, macOS or your router is usually that provider’s classic DNS service on port 53 — a different endpoint, transport and cache. Related, frequently correlated, but not the same measurement.
Before changing anything, record your current settings so you can put them back. On most systems the original setting is “Obtain DNS server address automatically” (DHCP) — returning to that undoes the change completely.
Each guide covers IPv4 and IPv6 separately, distinguishes classic DNS from DNS-over-HTTPS, and ends with a check that the change worked plus the exact steps to roll it back.
Check DNS records and email configuration, or follow a setup guide for your device.
Enterprise IT news update: CISA set a 13 November deadline on the exploited Barracuda ESG root chain, and the appliance keeps no record of earlier attacks.
Cybersecurity news update: Microsoft fixed 1,093 flaws, but the only one under active attack is rated just 6.5 and Windows Update does not deliver its fix.
Tech infrastructure news: N-able took N-central offline worldwide after 33 unverified zero-day claims were published on GitHub, and no CVE has been issued.
Latest data breach update: Chainalysis says password hashes and live tokens for all users were exposed, and restored service behind an IP allowlist first.
DNS security: ESET says SlippyNunchucks hijacked the DNS of a Sogou hostname to drop the DarkVigil backdoor over plain HTTP. Tencent patched it in 16.10.
Breaking enterprise IT news: OpenSSH 10.6p2 patches CVE-2026-123158, a musl libc flaw letting an over-long password unlock passwordless Alpine accounts.
Cybersecurity news: WordPress patched a core upgrade race condition, CVE-2026-119977, now exploited in the wild with a federal remediation deadline today.
Tech infrastructure warning: internet-facing supermarket fridge controllers attacked across Europe, and the fleet went offline rather than getting patched.
Data breach update: Harvard lost 850,500 alumni and donor email addresses to a single phone call, and the true size took almost a year to become public.
DNS security: the script tag never changed. A registrar-level DNS hijack repointed the host and $2.7 million left 726 Polymarket wallets in under an hour.
Enterprise IT news: a public certificate was enough to authenticate as any trusted LXD or MicroCloud client. No private key, no stolen secret, no rotation.
Cybersecurity news: five vendors rated the Linux kernel TCP flaw CVE-2026-98432 from 9.8 down to 5.9, and RHEL and Ubuntu still have no patched kernel.
We use essential cookies to run this site and, with your consent, advertising cookies (Google AdSense) and analytics to support our free service. See our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.